By: JP
I am new here, so just out of curiosity: is WUWT purely about climate issues, or is it also a forum for supporting right wing politics? [RyanM: you'll find that many of the readers and purveyors on...
View ArticleBy: Ryan Maue
Note: this was the comment of the day (April 17): very snarky and witty :-) evanmjones says: April 17, 2011 at 7:26 am (Edit) Socialist Youth Climate Conference Redistribution of warmth?
View ArticleBy: Todd D
Why am I not surprised that at no point in this story do you actually identify the legislation the EPA is proposing? Seems pretty sensationalist to post this video of Rep Gardner grilling this EPA...
View ArticleBy: kadaka (KD Knoebel)
Todd D vents on April 18, 2011 at 2:25 am (bold added): <blockquote>Why am I not surprised that <b>at no point in this story do you actually identify the legislation the EPA is...
View ArticleBy: TomVonk
Why am I not surprised that at no point in this story do you actually identify the legislation the EPA is proposing? Bad reading skills ? It’s written for those who can read . The issue was the EPA’s...
View ArticleBy: Michael Jennings
Todd D; There is definitely an idiot hidden somewhere in your comment but alas it is not Rep. Gardner. That leaves two people left and I will allow you to choose which one it is.
View ArticleBy: Theo Barker
As a constituent of Rep. Gardner, I sent him an email thanking him and asking him to pursue Lisa Jackson and the EPA for greater accountability, instead of letting them off so easy. Thanks to the other...
View ArticleBy: Todd D
Kadaska, TomVonk: Which regulation? This one? http://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/RuleGate.nsf/byRIN/2050-AE81?opendocument or some other one? Is it one that says you can’t legally dump coal ash into my...
View ArticleBy: flicka47
Todd D Well, I don’t know which specific regulation it is either, but… Why does the EPA have to regulate what they are calling a “non-hazardous waste” which is what they called it in your link?
View ArticleBy: kadaka (KD Knoebel)
From Todd D on April 18, 2011 at 11:07 am: <blockquote>My point is the article makes a reference to <b>WHAT</b> is being regulated, but not the regulation being...
View ArticleBy: caipira
Ryan Maue says: April 18, 2011 at 12:24 am Note: this was the comment of the day (April 17): very snarky and witty :-) evanmjones says: April 17, 2011 at 7:26 am (Edit) Socialist Youth Climate...
View ArticleBy: Richard G
Todd D says: April 18, 2011 at 11:07 am “…My point is the article makes a reference to WHAT is being regulated, but not the regulation being proposed. As a group most of you seem to be up in arms that...
View ArticleBy: TonyG
CRS, Dr.P.H. says: —- REPLY Dena, that is exactly how this model of government is supposed to function! The EPA, as a federal agency with a seat on the Cabinet, reports only to the Executive branch...
View ArticleBy: Elene Parker
Speaking of the EPA, I actually came across an article today that I think you may or may not have seen already, but it sheds a pretty good light on the current situation with the EPA and the “Haze...
View ArticleBy: oatley
Winning the House gave the Republicans committee chairmanship and the opportunity to call the bureaucrats to testify (what were there assumptions in their models…if any at all) for the record. This is...
View ArticleBy: kadaka (KD Knoebel)
From Theo Goodwin on April 17, 2011 at 7:56 am: <blockquote>(...) Locally, some people have been killed by high pressure leaks from pin holes in water lines. (...)</blockquote> Sure, I can...
View ArticleBy: Smokey
“What would it take to get a politician to say, ‘You’re fired!?’ ” The bureaucrat would have to be a Republican.
View ArticleBy: Andrew30
Rep. Cory Gardner: Mr. Stanislaus, in order to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide that you are re-releasing in to this chamber I ask that you confine your answers to simply yes or no, or better yet...
View Article
